Rachel suspects Ross was at a Coldplay concert last night.

Copy Room - After not answering her phone and seeing some suspicious activity on social media, Rachel Green is convinced that Ross Geller was at the Coldplay concert last night... and that he didn't go alone.

Alarm bells went off after the former Ralph Lauren executive publicly declared that she suspects Ross attended the British band's performance in the city, especially after seeing a guy on the "Kiss Cam" who looked very similar to him... too similar.

Rachel finds out about Ross and the copy Girl pic.twitter.com/DAcMv9w1ab

— Parody Chandler Bing (@ChandlerBing_12) August 15, 2023

Rachel wants to watch Coldplay videos

Even though Ross had told her he went to bed early—which sounds odd at first—Rachel started to get suspicious after noticing the copy girl wasn't home either, and that was too much to let go.

Of course, the paleontologist denies everything. According to his version, he spent all night in his apartment cleaning fossilized bones, which Rachel didn't buy in the slightest, since, according to her diary, she had already done that last week when she also mysteriously disappeared.

Hope Rachel didn't see this? #Coldplay #friends @Unnamedinsider pic.twitter.com/OmVSRWFCfi

— Rik Harris (@rikharriscom) July 18, 2025

“ Look, I may have gone… but I went with my friends from the museum. And besides, we were on break!” Ross finally shouted, using his classic defense argument, which has lost legal validity in New York since 2004.

Coldplay has yet to confirm whether or not the couple in question was on a break , but rumors are already circulating that Chris Martin will release the full video of the couples recorded during their performance to see if the keyboard virtuoso also appears.

And because the joke is delicious: we now know whether the guy from the Coldplay concert apologized to his wife or not.

Important: Remember that El Deforma is a site for entertainment, humor, and satire. The content in our articles should NOT be taken as a real source of information, even if some elements of the article are true. The only section where the content is 100% real is the "Unbelievable but True" section.