Why Rome Must Stand Up to Paris and London: European Soldiers in Ukraine, Here's How It Would End

Donald Trump is flooding the ground, some of his initiatives are destined to evaporate, others will give rise to unprecedented facts, a new scenario. The hysteria with which Europe reacts to the White House's initiatives is only a loss of energy and concentration: on duties the European Union has a problem with America and with itself (it's called VAT), therefore we must go to the table with Trump with a proposal in mind and not whining, because tears will be shed when the American customs will start to present the bill to European companies, we must prepare seriously, not launch tragicomic democratic alarms against the Roman salutes Made in America.

On the end of the war in Ukraine, the initiative is American because without the United States there would have been no resistance from Kiev and Europe has always followed Washington. And here we come to the most delicate point: the idea of ​​France and the United Kingdom to send European soldiers. Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer are two progressive leaders in crisis, trying to take control of the game in a radioactive chessboard. The defense of Kiev's security must be entrusted above all to the Ukrainians, as Foreign Affairs also underlined. We are talking about an immense territory (over 600 thousand square kilometers, an extension from New York to Chicago and from Toronto to Raleigh, North Carolina) where a few thousand soldiers sent from Paris and London get lost.

The Maga administration horrifies Europeans, but infantilism is not a shining category of politics, it is a problem. France is not Napoleon's France, Macron ordered the withdrawal from Mali, but tells the world that he is preparing to defend Ukraine; as for the English, they won the Second World War, but Starmer did not live in Downing Street, Winston Churchill did. Over and out.